• Tentang UGM
  • IT Center
  • English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • English
Universitas Gadjah Mada Center for Southeast Asian Social Studies
Universitas Gajah Mada
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Researcher
    • Partner Researcher
    • Partner Institution
    • Library
  • Research
  • Program
    • International Conference
    • SUMMER COURSE
    • CESASS Research Fellowship
    • INTERNSHIP
    • CESASS TALK
    • CESASS Chat
    • CESASS Vodcast
    • SEA Movie
    • Workshop
  • Publication
    • Journal
    • Book
    • Proceeding
    • Policy Brief
  • Academic Essay
    • Culture & Linguistics
    • Digital Society
    • Economic and Social Welfare
    • Education
    • Media & Communication Studies
    • Law & Human Rights
    • Politics and International Relations
    • Article Guidelines
  • Home
  • Activity
  • [SEA Talk #21] Corporate Power and Global Governance: Australian Miners in Indonesia

[SEA Talk #21] Corporate Power and Global Governance: Australian Miners in Indonesia

  • Activity, SEA Talk_eng
  • 12 May 2018, 14.06
  • Oleh: pssat
  • 0

On Friday (11/5/18), SEA Talk #21 was conducted on “Corporate Power and Global Governance: Australian Miners in Indonesia” with Lian Sinclair from Murdoch University as the presenter. This topic was based on his fieldwork on Australian Mining companies operating in three different locations in Indonesia namely Kulonprogo, Kutai Barat and Halmahera Utara.

Lian discussed that mining companies tend to be benefited from global governance (UN, WTO, and others) when conflicts with local communities occurred. One of strategy of dealing with those conflicts was CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility). CSR helped the companies to reduce possibility of clash with local societies as they indirectly involved in companies’ management process. However, many conflicts still persisted because of the localities of the problems.

At the end of discussion, Lian summed up his talk by explaining the cycle of conflict. Conflicts between local communities and companies expanded and then began to attract national public interest. Eventually, they would be discussed in an international forum in one of Global Governance agencies. Companies power then would be strengthened through a series of agreements. Conflicts that were resolved with an international approach tend to be repeated because it only reshaped the conflicts not resolved it. (Endo)

Recent Posts

  • CESASS Chat #46: “Regime Types in Southeast Asia and the Interpretation of ASEAN Norms”
  • Fostering Academic Exchange with Center of Peatland and Disaster Studies, Universitas Riau (CPDS UNRI)
  • CESASS Chat #45: “A Nation Within a City: Contesting Space and Meaning in the Indonesian Capital” & “Perceptions of the Past and Present: What Does Borobudur Represent in the Wider Context of Discussions on Heritage?”
  • Supporting Institutional Efforts toward a Center of Excellence with Pusat Riset Sistem Peradilan Pidana Universitas Brawijaya (PERSADA UB)
  • Book Chapter: “Popular Culture in Cross-Cultural Understanding: Roles, Challenges, and Opportunities”
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Center for Southeast Asian Social Studies
Universitas Gajah Mada

Gedung PAU, Jl. Teknika Utara
Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281
pssat@ugm.ac.id
+62 274 589658

Instagram | Twitter | FB Page | Linkedin | Youtube

© Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY